Dissent vs. Disagreement Essay

In pledge to Daniel J. Boorstins theory, one(a) can rec solely several events in the archives of Americas democracy when variety paved the path for discussions and solutions scarcely dissent only produced greater separation. Disagreement is the basis for democracy because for each one citizen has a choice to agree or disagree and try to dupe a change. For example, in the 1950s, Brown v. Board of Education was a production of constant disagreement between Americans ab bring out whether segregation of schools is constitutional or not. Because of these ongoing debates, the decision was made to end segregation in schools. Similarly, a tragic genocide in Sudan causes many arguments between the American muckle as the problem worsens and Americans must decide if they should step in. Again, the disagreement of the American democracy acts as its foundation for success and unity, while in Boorstins words, a democracy is killed by disagreement.If in the 1950s, the African Americans ch ose to go on living with dissension, or deciding to forever feel obscure from others, then perhaps America would not have a foreboding(a) president today. Because many people disagreed with the harsh racial segregation and disparity of that time, they were able to act on their opinions and make a change that influenced the prospective of America. African Americans fought for equality by disagreeing, instead of dissenting, and their efforts are evident in todays unsegregated society. In Boornstins words, A soulfulness who dissents is by definition in a minority. The African Americans did not want to be know as the lesser minority, but by equal citizens of the American democracy, and the way they succeeded in making their struggles known was by debating and arguing against segregation and discrimination. Brown v. Board of Education was an outcome of one of their acknowledged treats.Because of this decision, segregation in schools were finally deemed unconstitutional. An improvem ent was made in the American democracy, and it was because of the life blood of democracy, which in Boorstins words, is known as Disagreement. Unlike the Brown v. Board of Education Decision, the American government mostly used dissension to deal with the genocide in Sudan. Some call it, The Silent Genocide, because on that point were many, many, casualties but there was no awareness for the issue. Although many recognized that the issue was appalling, few took action and produced debates and disagreements, causing the issue to linger instead of improve. The regular disagreement which a liberal society thrives on was overshadowed by dissension and ignorance.The genocide in Sudan was not able to be fully helped, or helped at all at first. As Boorstin says, dissension is its democracys cancer and this is evident in this result because Americans chose to dissent and feel apart from this problem, which only caused it to get worse. Boorstin recognizes the differences between dissension and disagreement in a way that makes evident that dissent is vain to our societys conflicts whereas disagreement serves as the first step to range a solution. While Brown v. Board of education is an example of how disagreement led to improvement, the issue of the genocide in Sudan showed how a great descend of dissension and a lack of discussion, disagreement and knowledge, can turn out to be a democracys cancer.