'Public Perception of Police Essay\r'

'Being a police officeholder is one of the hardest jobs nigh. They ar trained and hired to â€Å" encourage and serve” their communities and they are constantly in the reality substance. Every thing that they do is criticized by the good deal who are observance them. Like in every otherwise profession, in that location are some who should au indeedtically not be doing that job, and those peck give a lousy prognosticate to the really good and employ military officers that work so hard to take care of plurality.\r\nOne of the problems that endeavour the state-supported to start a lower level of good go out toward police is the rising nuisance rate. People believe that if on that point are much than crimes being committed, the police are not doing a proper job of fish fillet it. This tends to oblige people doubt the abilities that police have. (Koenig)Some of the negative feedback in regards to policing comes from allegations of maintain cover-ups roundly applied to racial accusations, ethnicity and to some degree, economical class. (Connolly, 2001) These issues are on a daily terra firma and over all that gives the open a negative view of the police force in general. The media has a big part in the negative standpoint people have of the police. They tend to focus on the good-for-nothing things that happen and although police are right human beings and do consecrate mistakes, which is the scarce thing the media gives attention to so they get their viewers and readers to set expose a negative attitude towards impartiality enforcement. (Connolly, 2001) another(prenominal) issue that is big in the news regarding justice enforcement is that police are violent.\r\nThere have been ca hold when police have used violence and in some fibers it was unjustified. But those sequents are isolated and do not happen as frequently as the media tends to make people believe. Police exit only use force when they are in endanger ment and even then, they give the criminal every come-at- able-bodied chance to surrender before force is used. If the media focus more on the positive things that law enforcement does for the public, more people would likely have a more positive viewpoint towards them. (Connolly, 2001)The public seems to be cleave on the viewpoint of law enforcement. Some are in agreement with a certain aggregate of force being used while the other half tends to believe that it is dangerous for the police to use any kind of force especially when it is colligate to racial, ethical or socio-economical issues. (Connolly, 2001) It is believed that media bias started back when on that point were issues regarding the Vietnam War and Civil Rights struggles.\r\nPolice are doing the outdo job they are able to do and it would unimpeachably make their jobs easier if they had more support and backing from the people they are trying to protect. (Connolly, 2001)There are many quantify that the police ha ve to get control of a person or of people and this can wax to be very difficult physically and also very dangerous to the police and to the person or people they are trying to control. Nobody wants to ask that that is the truth but unfortunately it is. Some people may believe that because of what they see on tv either in a movie or from the news, if they do something to irritate any cop, they will be beaten for it and then made out to smell like they are the ones who brought it on, whether they deserve it or not. And in most cases, no one deserves to be beaten. (Connolly, 2001)According to tr group Aler (2009), police do not pick bad officers, those bad officers are made. Even the most dedicated police officer who gets out of the police honorary society and is all fired up to get out and help people, can see his or her most discovered superior overcome on someone who really is not deserving of it and eventually worm around and do the same thing.\r\nThat is not profound o f course, but if that officer is not caught then no one is going to know any better. tramp had been an officer at one time and see an officer he worked with whom he admired beating others. Basically, the ability of being a cop got to tramper’s head and he took advantage of that power until a prosecutor gave him a reality check. tramper believes that the cops that have a conscience penury to be the ones who take control of the bad seeds and assist with stopping police brutality. (Stamper, 2009)In February 2009, a Washington State Sheriff brought a â€Å"slender 15 year old daughter” into custody, brought her into a holding cell and told her to remove her shoes.\r\nAs she was removing her shoes, she allegedly kicked one off and it hit the officer, capital of Minnesota Schene, in the shin. This was not done intentionally, but the officer became enraged and began to beat the girl. He kicked her, pulled her hair and launch his knees into her back, as well as  "slugging” her. All of this was caught on camera. (Stamper, 2009) Throughout the incident, the girl gave no resistance and afterwards it happened, she was handcuffed and brought out of view of the camera. Later on the girl verbalise she was having trouble breathing and paramedics were called. Officer Schene said only that she had a panic attack.\r\nIncidents such as that one are what the public are unnerved of and what gives good cops a bad name. It is reported that the incident with that girl is ranked just as bad as the Rodney King beating and the attack of Abner Louima. (Stamper, 2009) When those incidents sound public knowledge, law enforcement holds to scramble to go out a reason behind what they did. Often times that is not possible and it makes the public’s already tainted point of view even darker.\r\nIt is really definitive for police to communicate with the public and make them aware of things that they did not already know. Perhaps if the public was m ore aware of things that the police did behind the scenes, they would be more apt to trust in law enforcement and not be so judgmental or critical of them. In some ways, yes citizens do have valid reasons for being so concerned about certain things they hear on the news or read in the papers. But a bay window of times, stories may be exaggerated and that will make people worry for no reason.\r\nIn regards to policing and racism, there are some instances where race does come into take over when police are working on solving a certain crime. An example would be a crime family under investigation for any figure of speech of crimes. Typically, that particular crime family will only rent certain people into their group and those people are all from the same type of ethnic backgrounds. some other example would be someone like a rapist or serial killer. If they have an eye witness to the crime, they will be able to preserve their investigations based on the witness’s descripti on. The shadowed may be of one race or ethnic group and therefore, the police must pass an eye out for people who fit that description. That cannot be considered racial, although people will still say that it is. (Connolly, 2001)While not everyone will agree that the police are not shady and are giving people breaks that do not deserve them, everyone should agree that in the case of an emergency, it is nice to know that they have someone around who will be able to assist them.\r\nIt is important for the public to know that they have help when they get hold of it. Sometimes, police will offer a schoolmaster courtesy to a fellow officer and when the public gets wind of that, chaos breaks. Most people will not agree that police officers should not be punished for a crime that a civil commits and gets punished for. This makes the general public very risky and then they think they are not able to count on the police when they really need to. Law enforcement also needs to remember t hat if they are going to allow a member of their birth force to get away with someone and then they find a citizen who commits the same crime, such as drunk driving, if that person knows that the cop got away with it, they will expect the same treatment. That is a valid logical argument for them to have.\r\nIn closing, law enforcement really is there to protect and serve. That is their job and 99.9 percent of those people love what they do. Civilians need to understand and accept that.\r\nReferences\r\nKoenig, D.J. (n.d.) Police perceptions of public respect and extra-legal use of force: a reconsideration of household wisdom and pluralistic ignorance. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 1(3), 313-324. Retrieved April 26, 2009, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx? look at=true&db=sih&AN=13959331&site=ehost-livedatabaseConnolly, C.P. (2001). In Defense of Police. The National executive director Institute Associates (NEIA). Retrieved April 27, 2009, from http://www.n eiassociates.org/defense.htmStamper, N. (2009, March 11). Former Police important on Cop Brutality: â€Å"Law Enforcement Doesn’t Pick Bad Apples; It Makes Them”. Huffington Post retrieved on April 27, 2009 from http://www.alternet.org/rights/131014/former_police_chief_on_cop_brutality:_%22law_enforcement_doesn’t_pick_bad_apples%3B_it_makes_them%22/\r\n'